Amazing international borders around the world:
Thanks :)
Source: Sarcastic Facts
To the naked eye, a grain of table salt is just a jagged white speck. Under magnification, it reveals itself as a nearly perfect, interlocking cube.
Human eyes evolved to interpret the macroscopic world—to spot a predator in the brush or judge the ripeness of a fruit—completely ignoring the microscopic architecture that holds physical reality together. When a microscope bypasses that biological filter, it reveals that the most mundane objects are built from startling geometric and functional complexity.
This stark geometry occurs because salt is composed of sodium and chloride ions that naturally attract each other, locking together in a rigid, repeating 3D grid. The sharp corners and flat faces seen under a lens are the direct, scaled-up manifestation of salt's atomic lattice.
Biological objects look equally alien because magnification exposes the hidden mechanics of nature. A strawberry, for example, is not actually a true berry, but an "aggregate accessory fruit." The tiny specks on its surface, which people commonly call seeds, are actually individual dry fruits called achenes, each containing a single seed. Under a microscope, these achenes look like tough, textured armor plates embedded in a sweeping, fleshy landscape. Magnification reveals this complex reproductive strategy, stripping away the illusion of a simple, uniform red surface.
The technology used to view these objects also plays a massive role in why they look so captivating. Scanning electron microscopes (SEM) do not use visible light at all. Instead, they bounce beams of electrons off a sample's surface, creating images with incredible depth of field and stark shadowing. This process gives microscopic pollen grains, insect eyes, or woven fabrics a vivid, three-dimensional quality that traditional optical lenses cannot easily replicate.
Everyday objects look amazing under magnification because they are fundamentally engineered by physics and biology at a scale people were never meant to observe. A microscope simply grants temporary access to that hidden structural reality.
•No, Mumbai Central (MMCT) and Mumbai CST are not the same location, they are different stations in Mumbai.
•Mumbai Central is located near the Jagannath Shankar Sheth Metro Station and nearby area-Byculla, whereas Mumbai CST locates near Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Chowk, Wankhede Stadium
•Mumbai Central comes under Western Railways whereas Mumbai CST comes under Central Railways
•Mumbai Central Station mainly handles trains to Gujarat, Rajasthan,Delhi, Punjab and Haryana, whereas Mumbai CST operates trains to Goa,South India, Central India,West Bengal,Odisha.
•Within Maharashtra it operates to other destinations like Pune, Kolhapur, Sawantwadi, Solapur, Nanded, Nagpur, Manmed, Sai Nagar Shirdi and Dhule
•Just like in India, different railway terminals operate trains to different regions.
•Howrah Jn & Sealdah
•New-Delhi & Anand Vihar Terminal
•Chennai Central & Chennai Egmore
•Now Mumbai CST is officially known as Mumbai CSMT (Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Terminus)
The Runways that are built on the top of a hill, by levelling it off, to create plain area to make the landing strip, are typically known as ‘table top runways’. Quite a few are there in India.
These runways leave little space for an aircraft, in case of late touchdown and poses problems particularly during bad weather times.
They also pose danger of optical illusion to the landing pilots, making it difficult to estimate the distance from beginning of runway.
01) Mangalore Airport, Karnataka
02) Kozhikode Airport (Calicut), Keralam
03) Shimla Airport, Himachal Pradesh
04) Pakyong Airport, Sikkim
Pic Courtesy: Google
This boundary is the cosmological horizon, effectively the edge of the observable universe. It represents the maximum distance from which light has had time to travel to Earth since the universe began, approximately 13.8 billion years ago. Because the speed of light is finite, looking out into space means looking back in time. However, there is a physical limit to how far observers can see, dictated by the age of the universe and the speed of light.
What makes this boundary dynamic—and fatal for observing distant galaxies—is the expansion of the universe. The universe is not just expanding; its expansion is actively accelerating, driven by a phenomenon physicists call dark energy. As the fabric of space stretches, it pushes galaxies farther apart. For galaxies that are already at immense distances, the sheer volume of space expanding between them and Earth means they are receding at a rate faster than the speed of light.
This does not violate Einstein's theory of relativity. The galaxies themselves are not traveling through space faster than light; rather, the space between the galaxies is expanding.
When a galaxy is pushed far enough away, it crosses what is known as the cosmological event horizon. Any light that the galaxy emits after crossing this boundary will never be able to cross the rapidly expanding gulf of space to reach Earth. The expansion of the universe outpaces the light trying to traverse it, much like a swimmer trying to swim upstream against a current that is moving faster than they can paddle.
Observers on Earth can still see the light these galaxies emitted before they crossed the horizon, but even this light is severely affected. The expansion of space stretches the light waves, shifting them toward the red end of the spectrum. Over time, this "redshift" stretches the light into infrared, then microwaves, and eventually faint radio waves, until the galaxy fades into complete undetectability.
Because of this accelerating expansion, the night sky is slowly emptying out. Trillions of years from now, any beings looking up at the cosmos will see only the stars within their own gravitationally bound local group of galaxies. The rest of the universe will have slipped beyond the cosmological horizon, leaving behind an incredibly dark and isolated sky.
There is a wooden house called Puthanveedu in Erumeli, a small town on the way to Sabarimala. According to the Legend, Sree Ayyappan Swamy arrived on the spot in the thick of darkness and saw a lamp burning in a house where an old woman stayed alone. She gave him food and shelter for the night and the next day he had his tryst with Mahishi, an asura whom he killed. As a mark of reverence to the old woman who helped him in his hour of need, he is believed to have presented his sword to her, which remains enshrined in a dedicated Puja room within the house to this day.
The legendary sacred sword of Sree Ayyappa Swamy, believed to have been used to kill Mahishasura, is still preserved in the centuries-old Puthanveedu.
Erumeli's name itself derives from "eruma-kolli " (buffalo killing place), underscoring the site's deep ties to the Ayyappa cult, which blends historical elements with mythological narratives of divine intervention and devotion.
The centuries old mud-and-wooden structure of Puthanveedu, Erumeli. In July 2011, the building suffered partial damage from a fire that destroyed much of its roof.
The old structure of Puthanveedu is more than 600 years old, preserved by the descendants of the elderly woman who sheltered Sree Ayyappa Swami. The Karanavar (patriarch) of the family is traditionally known as Perisserry Pillai. The Kochambalam Sastha Temple was built by Perisserry Pillai, a Karanavar of this family.
Puthanveedu is a Saiva Vellala family with a long history. This family originally came from Panayadiyarkavu, Tiruchirappalli, where they served as Kanakkapillai (accountants) to the Pandyas. When the Pandya kingdom declined and the royal family migrated to different places, a branch of this family migrated along with a branch of the Pandya royals to Kerala (later the Pandalam royals) and settled in Erumeli. Puthanveedu is situated near the Valiyambalam in Erumeli. A section of the devotees who visit Sabarimala go to the Sannidhanam after visiting Puthanveedu. Although the Devaswom Board had expressed interest in taking over Puthanveedu, the heirs decided to maintain it.
There is another tradition linking Ayyappa Swami and the Puthanveedu family.
Ayyappan, known as Ayyan, who belonged to the Vellalar kulam, was the army chief of the Pandalam royal family. He lived with his uncle, Perissery Pillai, in Erumeli, Kottayam district, Kerala. This was about ten generations ago.
Ayyan was instrumental in the defeat of Udayanan, who attacked Sabarimala and tried to demolish the ancient Sastha temple in the thick forest of present-day Pathanamthitta district.
Meanwhile, the royal family of the Pandya king had migrated from Tamil Nadu about 800 years ago. The king reconstructed the destroyed Sastha temple at Sabarimala with the help of Ayyan, Vavar, a Muslim youth from Kanjirappally, and Kadutha a Nair youth from Muzhukeer, Chengannur, Alappuzha district. During a clash, Ayyappan was killed. His uncle, Perissery Pillai, constructed the Kochambalam—an old, small Sastha temple—at Erumeli, opposite the Vavar Pally (mosque), which was constructed by Muslims in memory of Vavar Swamy.
After the demise of Ayyappan, it is believed that his soul merged with Lord Sastha, and people came to regard him as an avatar of Lord Sastha. Later, Ayyappan and Sastha became synonymous.
In the age-old Elavarsevampattu, it is clearly mentioned that Ayyan belonged to the Vellalar kulam near Erumeli, Kottayam, Kerala. There still exists a Vellala house called Puthenveedu in Erumeli. In the same compound, there is a 300-year-old thatched mud house—the house of Perissery Pillai, Ayyappan’s uncle and the Vellal chieftain of Erumeli. Even today, one can see the ancient sword believed to have been used by Ayyappan to kill the monstrous eruma-mahisham.
Swamiye Saranam Ayyappa…..
Footnotes
[1] Legendary house partially gutted[2] Sabarimala-The pilgrimage is a symbol of love, equality and devotionFor leading men, there is a pervasive illusion that every action star is well over six feet tall. In reality, the camera favors proportion over sheer size. Actors with slightly larger heads and broader shoulders often register as massive on screen, regardless of their actual vertical measurement. Sylvester Stallone, Mark Wahlberg, and Tom Cruise all hover around or below average height, yet they have dominated the action genre for decades. Directors use low-angle shots, forced perspective, and specialized footwear to enhance their stature. When an actor is exceptionally tall, it can actually create framing problems. A massive height discrepancy between two actors requires the camera to pull back, which can disrupt the intimacy of close-up dialogue scenes.
To solve this, production crews rely on a simple piece of equipment: the apple box. During the run of The X-Files, the crew built custom ramps and boxes—affectionately dubbed "Scully boxes"—so the 5-foot-3 Gillian Anderson could comfortably share the frame with the 6-foot David Duchovny.
However, height expectations historically placed a different burden on female actors. For decades, traditional casting dictated that women should not tower over their male romantic leads. Actresses like Sigourney Weaver and Geena Davis, both hitting the six-foot mark, have noted that their height initially cost them roles, as some leading men refused to work alongside women who were taller than them. Fortunately, the industry has become slightly more flexible over time. Today, tall actresses frequently share the screen with shorter male co-stars without the production resorting to trick photography or trenches to hide the difference.
Ultimately, casting directors are far more concerned with an actor's screen presence, charisma, and facial geometry than the tape measure. In Hollywood, physical height is just a starting point; the camera, the framing, and a few wooden boxes handle the rest.
Following pictures are those pictures, which I find amazing.
Incense stick harvest in Vietnam
New Zealand
Weasely twins
Akita, Japan