Monday, February 16, 2026

Why is Bollywood often criticized despite its massive global popularity?

 Bollywood which was referred originally as Hindi cinema was widely appreciated for the kind of directors like Satyajit Ray, Hrishikesh Mukherjee, Bimal Roy and many others. Even Raj Kapoor was highly regarded for his international appeal despite his movies having an overtone of sexuality.

The Hindi cinema transitioned soon into “Bollywood” or Mumbai centred film making which brought in a lot of the current unwanted problems such as nepotism, underworld funding, skin shows and blatant plagiarism.

Until 1970s, there were good directors who gave the respect, the script deserves. Even though they would enrol a Rajesh Khanna or an Amitabh, the script will do the talking.

Common men across India who watch Hindi movies could relate to the angry young man Amitabh or the romantic Rishi Kapoor. And for the artistic Cinema lovers, there was always the parallel cinema and the likes of Smita Patil, Farooq Sheikh, Amol Palekar delivering wonderful movies such as Golmaal, Choti Si Baat.

Enter 1990s and the big fat Punjabi family based movies. It was tolerable for a few years. Maine Pyaar Kiya was a big hit for the songs and for getting out of the then cliched Amitabh movies.

The younger generation could relate to the romcoms and freshness. But this became a pattern. With more and more Punjabi families shifting to United Kingdom, Sikhs to Canada and later even other groups migrating to US, Bollywood found a big international audience market for consuming big fat Punjabi based movies.

Hum Aapke Hain Koun - another big fat Punjabi wedding based movie.

The selection of scripts were centred around big stars, big casting, songs and meaningless comedy.

DDLJ was a landmark film that showcased big fat Punjabi families and how it is ok to “Jee Lee Apni Zindagi”.

But with that, started the tiring series of movies that adapted the same style.

Pardes

Dil to Pagal Hai

Kuch Kuch Hota Hai

Hum Saath Saath Hain

Kal Ho Na Ho

Don’t mistake me, all the above movies were a hit. But the script was becoming tedious on the viewers. Many of the other state Hindi movie viewers could not relate to a rich guy living in US or UK but still longing for Indian values.

In between, Bollywood tried War movies like Border, Lakshya and LoC Kargil and provided some relief.

Then came what I call the “Unfaithful” genre. Starting with “Jism” and “Murder” about a dozen films came on extra marital affair. Emran Hashmi notoriously became popular for this genre.

The reason bollywood is criticised is for makign cliched movies. Sticking to a genre that sells once.

A wise old uncle told me an analogy, way back in 1999.

If there is one idly shop and it is popular, it will make good money. Then there will be 10 idly shops in the same place and neither will make good money. He applied this logic to IT recession but it is applicable to Bollywood scripts also.

There were some very good movies by directors like Neeraj Pandey and those are the saving grace for the Hindi movie lovers.

But, largely, Bollywood dug its own grave with Nepotism, directors like Karan Johar, poor cliched scripts and depending too much on skin show.

Student of the Year was the most ridiculous movie I have seen depicting how students would be in college.

So to summarize, Bollywood needs good scripts and good actors like Rajkumar Rao, Ayushman Khurana to become relevant and successful.

It needs to shed the nepotism kids and come up with strong story based performances.