Showing posts with label mahabharata. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mahabharata. Show all posts

Friday, April 10, 2026

​Why did Karna refuse to join the Pandavas even after Krishna revealed he was the eldest brother?

 The Krishna-karna conversation in Udyoga parva might be interpolated. Therefore let's look at Karna's conversation with Kunti to see his reasoning.

Karna says that people will think that he switched sides because he is afraid of Arjuna

Who does not suffer when Dhananjaya is aided by Krsna? If I now go over to the Parthas, who will not think that I am frightened?

  • 144, Karna Upanivada parva, Mahabharata.

Karna says that he can't abandon the Kauravas suddenly after they have given everything to him and after he had given them hopes of victory

The sons of Dhritarashtra have given me a share in every object of desire. They have honoured me and given me every kind of happiness. How can I act counter to that now?They have always served me and have always bowed down before me, like the Vasus before Vasava. They now confront a feud with an enemy. They think that with my life, they can withstand the enemies. How can I act against the desire that is there in their minds?

  • 144, Karna Upanivada parva, Mahabharata.

So his two reasons were -

A. Fear of being called a coward.

B. Wanting to repay the Kauravas for their helps.

Tuesday, April 7, 2026

What are some of the contradictions about Shikhandi in the Mahabharata?

 The character of Shikhandi is full of contradictions.

On one hand the text tells us that Shikhandi in his past birth was a rakshasa

Know that maharatha Dhrishtadyumna was born from Agni's part. O king! Know that the male-female Shikhandi was born from a rakshasa.

  • 61, Sambhava Parva, Mahabharata.

With Droupadi, Dhrishtadyumna was born from the fire, as parts of the auspicious fire god. Know that Shikhandi was a rakshasa.

  • 1970 (39), Putra Darshana Parva, Mahabharata.

A second version about his previous birth has him being Amba. This is the more popular story

The Mahadeva, with the bull on his banner, spoke truthfully to the maiden. ‘O fortunate one! I do not utter false words. What I have said will come true. You will attain manhood and will kill Bhishma in battle. When you enter another body, you will remember everythingYou will be born as a maharatha in Drupada’s lineageYou will be an extremely honoured warrior who is swift in the use of weapons. O fortunate one! Everything will be exactly as I have said it will be. You will become a man after some time has passed.

  • 851 (188), Amba Upakhyana parva, Mahabharata.

Bhishma had a vow to never attack Shikhandi

When he appears before me with a bow in his hand, desiring to fight, I will not glance at him even for an instant and will not strike. This has always been my vow and it is renowned throughout the earth. A woman, one who has earlier been a woman, one who has the name of a woman and one who has the form of a woman -I will not shoot arrows at them. O descendant of the Kourava lineage! Because of this reason, I will not kill Shikhandi.

  • 856 (193), Ambopakhyana parva, Mahabharata.

Bhishma clearly says he will not shoot arrows at Shikhandi or strike him. However Bhishma himself has broken this vow.

However in the same text, Bhishma attacks Shikhandi multiple times

Shikhandi’s weapon had been sliced down by the king who was Shantanu’s son. On seeing that he was running away in that battle, the great-souled Ajatashatru became wrathful and spoke these words of anger to Shikhandi. ‘You spoke these words to me, in the presence of your father. “Using arrows that are clear and have the complexion of the sun, I will kill Bhishma, who is great in his vows. I say this truthfully.” This was the pledge you took and you are not making it come true. You are not killing Devavrata in battle. O brave one among men! You have become false in your oath. Protect your dharma and the fame of your lineage. Behold. Bhishma is fighting with terrible force. He is tormenting the masses of my soldiers. The net of his arrows is fierce in its energy. Like Death himself, he is killing everything in an instant. Your bow has been sliced down by the king who is Shantanu’s sonYou have been vanquished and are running away from the field of battleYou are abandoning your relatives and your brothers.

  • 941 (81), Bhishma Vadha parva, Mahabharata.

Drupada pierced Bhishma with twenty-five arrows, Virata with ten arrows and Shikhandi with twenty-five. O great king! The great-souled Bhishma was pierced in that battle and was as beautiful as a blossoming red ashoka tree in the spring. Gangeya pierced them back with three arrows that travelled straight.

  • 959 (99), Bhishma Vadha parva, Mahabharata.

The valiant Dhrishtaketu, the king of Panchala, Pandava Bhimasena, Parshata Dhrishtadyumna, the twins, Chekitana, the five from Kekaya, Satyaki, Subhadra’s son, Ghatotkacha, Droupadi’s sons, Shikhandi, the brave Kuntibhoja, Susharma, Virata and many other immensely strong ones among the Pandaveyas were oppressed by Bhishma’s arrows and were immersed in an ocean of grief.

  • 973 (113), Bhishma Vadha parva, Mahabharata.

A popular myth about Shikhandi is that Bhishma on 10th day cast aside his weapons on seeing him. But this is simply not true. Arjuna had to forcibly disarm Bhishma

Placing Shikhandi at the forefront, Kiriti impetuously attacked Bhishma and severed his bow. Kiriti, best among rathas, was protected by Krishna and in that battle, after Bhishma’s bow had been severed, pierced him with ten arrows. He struck down his charioteer with ten and his standard with one. Gangeya grasped a bow that was more powerful. However, Phalguna sliced that down with a sharp and broad-headed arrow. Pandava was enraged and one after another, Savyasachi, the scorcher of enemies, severed every bow that Bhishma took up. When the bows were severed, he became wrathful and licked the corners of his mouth great wrath, he grasped a javelin that was capable of shattering mountains. In anger, he hurled this towards Phalguna’s chariot. On seeing it descend, like the flaming vajra, the descendant of the Pandava lineage brought the javelin down with five sharp and broad-headed arrows. O best of the Bharata lineage! When that javelin, hurled angrily by Bhishma’s powerful arms, was severed with five arrows by the enraged Kiriti, it was shattered and fell down on the ground, like lightning dislodged from a mass of clouds. On seeing that the javelin had fallen down, Bhishma was overcome with anger.

  • 974 (114), Bhishma Vadha parva, Mahabharata.

So in summary

A. Shikhandi was a rakshasa in previous birth or was Amba.

B. Bhishma apparently vowed to never fire arrows at Shikhandi but did so many times.

C. Shikhandi’s presence did not make Bhishma cast away his weapons and he had to be defeated by Arjuna by force.

Was Karna truly wrong or just loyal to the wrong side?

 Karna was not an innocent person stuck in a wrong side. He was an active participant of Duryodhana's wicked deeds.

Since the days in Gurukula, Karna was jealous of Arjuna. This led to him hating the Pandavas and making friendship with Duryodhana

Then
the
valorous
Drona
taught
Pandu’s
sons
the
use
of
many
weapons,
human
and
divine.
O
bull
among
the Bharata
lineage!
Other
princes
also
came
to
Drona,
supreme
among
Brahmanas,
to
learn
the
use
of
arms—the
Vrishnis,
the
Andhakas,
kings
from
many
countries
and
Radheya,
the
son
of
the
suta.
They
made
Drona
their
preceptor.
The
suta’s
son
was
envious
of
Partha
and
always
competed
with
him.
With
Duryodhana’s
support,
he showed
his
contempt
for
the
Pandavas.”

  • 122, Sambhava Parva, Mahabharata.

Karna was part of the planning to kill Pandavas in Lakshagraha (Vrisha is Karna)

When the Pandavas were not killed through all these means, open and hidden, since they were protected by fate and destiny, he consulted his advisers: Vrisha, Duhshasana and the others. With Dhritarashtra's consent, he had a house of lac built.

  • 55, Adi-vamshavatarana parva, Mahabharata.

Karna laughed at Draupadi as Dushasana dragged her into the assembly

Duhshasana dragged her with even greater force, so that she almost lost her senses. He repeatedly called her “slave” and laughed uproariouslyKarna was delighted at these words and approved of them by laughing out loudly. In similar fashion, Soubala, the king of Gandhara, applauded Duhshasana’s deed.

  • 60, Dyuta parva, Mahabharata.

When Vikarna tried to prove that Draupadi was infact not a slave, Karna countered him saying that Draupadi is a courtesan for having 5 husbands

O descendant of the Kuru lineage! It has been ordained by the gods that a woman should only have one husband. However, she submits to many and it is therefore certain that she is a courtesan. It is my view that there is nothing surprising in her being brought into the sabha in a single garment, or even if she is naked.

  • 61, Dyuta parva, Mahabharata.

Following this, Karna is the one who ordered Dushasana to strip Draupadi naked

O Duhshasana ! This Vikarna is only a child, though he speaks words of wisdom. Strip away the garments from the Pandavas and Draupadi."

  • 61, Dyuta parva, Mahabharata.

Karna told Draupadi to enter Kuru household as a slave and serve the Kauravas

Karna said, “There are three who can own no property—a slave, a student and a woman. O fortunate one! You are the wife of a slave and have nothing of your own. You have no lord and are like the property of slaves. Enter and serve us. That is the task for you in this household. O Princess! All the sons of Dhritarashtra are now your masters and not the sons of Pritha. O beautiful one! Choose another one for your husband, one who will not make you a slave through gambling. Remember the eternal rule among slaves. Sexual acts with one’s masters are never censured. Nakula, Bhimasena, Yudhishthira, Sahadeva and Arjuna have been won over. O Yajnaseni! Enter as a slaveThe ones who have been won over can no longer be your husbands. Valour and virility are of no use to Partha now. In the middle of the sabha, he has gambled away the daughter of Drupada, the king of Panchala.”’

  • 63, Dyuta parva, Mahabharata.

Karna was part of Duryodhana's plan to capture Krishna

They decided on a course of action Duryodhana, Karna, Shakuni Soubala and Duhshasana as the fourth. “Janardana is swift in his action. Before he captures us, with King Dhritarashtra and Shantanu’s son, we will forcibly capture Hrishikesha, that tiger among men, like Indra seized Virochana’s son.

  • 128, Bhagavad Yana parva, Mahabharata.

On 14th day, Karna had no issue attacking Satyaki who did not have a chariot then (Yet this same guy hypocritically called on Arjuna to not attack him when his own chariot sunk to the ground)

On seeing that Satyaki was without a chariot and Karna was attacking him with raised weapons, Madhava blew a rsabha note on his conch shell with great force.

  • 122, Ghatotkacha vadha parva, Mahabharata.

Krishna termed Karna as the root of all of Duryodhana's wicked deeds

O Arjuna! Whether it was the attempt to burn down your mother with her sons in the night, or whatever Suyodhana attempted towards you in the course of the gambling match, the evil-souled Karna was the root of all that. Suyodhana always thought that he would be saved by Karna and angrily tried to seize me too. O one who grants honours! It is the firm belief of that Indra among men, Dhritarashtra’s son, that Karna will certainly defeat all the Parthas in battle. O Kounteya! Though Dhritarashtra’s son knew about your strength, he found pleasure in a conflict with you because he depended on Karna. Karna has always said, “I will defeat the assembled Parthas, Vasudeva and the kings in the great battle.” The evil-minded one has encouraged Dhritarashtra’s evil-souled son and roared in the assembly hall. O descendant of Bharata lineage ! Kill Karna today.

  • 51, Karna Vadha parva, Mahabharata.

Sanjaya severely criticized Karna as a wicked man who gave wrong advises to king Dhritarashtra and Duryodhana

You were avaricious and desired the fruits and did not act in accordance with what was good for you. Your advisers were Duhshasana, the evil-souled Radheya, the evilsouled Shakuni and the evil-minded Chitrasena.They were thorns and they made the entire world full of thorns for themselves.

  • 1, Vishoka parva, Mahabharata.

As you can see, Karna was an active participant in Duryodhana's misdeeds and it's because of his constant encouragement that Duryodhana even dared to wage war against the Pandavas.

Why did Lord Krishna not save Draupadi's five sons when he had the power?

 Because their time was up. Krishna wouldn't save someone just because they are related to the Pandavas.

Krishna is impartial. He won't save someone just because they were Draupadi's children

I am equally disposed to all living beings; I am neither inimical nor partial to anyone. But the devotees who worship Me with love reside in Me and I reside in them.

  • Gita 9.29.

The lifespan of the Upapandavas was up as stated by Lord Shiva

I have protected the Panchalas and have shown him honour. However, they have been overtaken by destiny and can no longer remain alive now."

  • 7, Sauptika parva, Mahabharata.

Krishna himself was the all powerful kala that destroyed both the armies in Kurukshetra

All those who have fallen on the field of battle have really been slain by Time. Verily, all of us have been slain by Time. Time is, indeed, all-powerful. You are fully conversant with the puissance of Time. Afflicted by Time, it does not behove you to grieve. Know that Krishna Himself, otherwise called Hari, is that Time with blood-red eyes and with club in hand. For these reasons, O son of Kunti, it does not behove you to grieve for your (slain) kinsfolk.

  • Section CXLVIII, Anusasanika parva, Mahabharata.

Markandeya Purana narrates how Draupadi's sons were cursed Visvedevas and were thus destined to die young without marriage and sons

Having heard this their remark, the sage of the Kaushika race, exceedingly enraged, cursed them—“Ye shall all assume human form!” And propitiated by them, the great Muni added, “Although in human form, ye shall have no offspring. There shall be neither marriage of wives for you, nor hostility: freed from love and anger ye shall become gods again.” Thereupon those gods descended to the mansion of the Kurus with their own portions; they were born of the womb of Draupadi as the five grandchildren of Pandu. Hence the five heroic Pandaveyas did not take to themselves wives, through the curse of that great Muni.

  • Canto VII, Markandeya Purana.

The destruction of Panchalas and Upapandavas were part of the Bhubharaharana or reducing the burden of earth. First Krishna destroyed the Kaurava army, then he destroyed the Pandava army and finally he destroyed the Yadavas.

Tuesday, March 24, 2026

Is “Sri Lanka” the “Lanka” of the Ramayana?

 

Samprati, the brother of Jatayu was waiting for Vanara Sena who went in search of Mata Sita. He was waiting for them in Vindhyan range.

From there they came to the northern end of the Indian Ocean.

Vanara Sena was in trouble as they couldn't think of any way to go to Lanka crossing such a big ocean. They didn't have big ships or boats and no time to build the ships.

Then, Jambavana suggested Hanuman had the capacity to cross the ocean and reach Lanka and find Mata Sita. Hanuman leapt from Mahendra mountains and crossing difficulties reached Trikuta Mountain in Lanka.

Lanka existed in the south of Vindhyan Range and in Indian Ocean.

Friday, March 20, 2026

What is Mahabharata?

 

The longest story ever written ends with the winners standing in the ruins of everything they destroyed to win.

That is not a spoiler. That is the warning the story puts at the beginning.

The Mahabharata was composed in ancient India thousands of years ago. It is ten times longer than the Iliad and the Odyssey combined. It contains within it the Bhagavad Gita. It contains more than one hundred thousand verses. It contains every human emotion, every moral dilemma, every possible answer to the question of how to live.

And it does not give you a clean ending. Because the question it is asking does not have a clean answer.

What is the right thing to do when every option available to you is wrong?

What the Mahabharata is actually about

The Sanskrit word is Dharma. Not religion. Not ritual. Not rules. Dharma as in your duty, your truth, the thing you are supposed to do based on who you are and what you owe to the world.

The Mahabharata is the story of what happens when an entire civilization cannot agree on what that means. And destroys itself trying to find out.

It begins, as so many catastrophes do, with a family.

The Kuru dynasty. One of the greatest royal families in the ancient world. And within that family, two sets of cousins.

The Pandavas. Five brothers. Yudhishthira the eldest, the righteous one, the man who could not tell a lie. Bhima the powerful, who could uproot trees with his bare hands. Arjuna the archer, the greatest warrior of his age. And the twins, Nakula and Sahadeva.

And the Kauravas. One hundred brothers. Led by the eldest, Duryodhana.

Here is the first thing you need to understand about Duryodhana

He is not a villain. He is a man with a wound that never healed.

His father Dhritarashtra was born blind. Because he was blind, the throne was given not to him but to his brother Pandu. Duryodhana grew up watching his father sit beside a throne that should have been his. Watching the sons of Pandu be celebrated and loved while he and his brothers were treated as secondary. As less than.

He was told, from the time he could understand words, that what was rightfully his had been taken.

That wound never healed. And a wound that never heals eventually becomes something else. It becomes a reason.

The arrival of Karna

The two sets of cousins grew up together, trained together, competed together. Arjuna was the greatest archer in the world. Everyone knew it. Then Karna arrived.

Son of the sun god Surya and a princess who, frightened and unmarried, had set her newborn son adrift on a river rather than face the shame. That child was Karna. He was raised by a charioteer. A good man, a loving man. But a charioteer, low born by the standards of the world he was born into.

Karna grew up to be the one warrior who could match Arjuna. He came to a tournament to prove it and was turned away because of his birth.

You cannot compete with princes. You are the son of a charioteer.

Duryodhana watched this happen. And did something that defined the entire epic.

He walked over to Karna, stood beside him, and gave him a kingdom on the spot, making him a king, making him equal in rank to any prince in the hall so that he could compete.

Duryodhana saw two things in that moment. A weapon against Arjuna. And a man being treated unjustly. Both were true. And he acted on both at once.

That is what made Karna's loyalty so absolute. He was not just given a kingdom. He was seen. Fully. By someone who understood what it meant to be denied what you deserved.

Karna never forgot it. And that loyalty, that bond forged in a moment of genuine recognition, is what makes the Mahabharata the most tragic story ever written.

The dice game

Yudhishthira had one flaw. One crack in all that righteousness. He could not refuse a challenge.

The code of a warrior king demanded that you accept a challenge when it was issued. To refuse was to lose honor. To be less than what you were supposed to be.

Duryodhana knew this. And his uncle Shakuni, the greatest dice player who ever lived, sat across the board.

Yudhishthira lost the first round. And played again. And lost. And played again. He lost his treasury. He lost his kingdom. He lost his army. He lost his brothers' freedom, staking them one by one as pieces on a board.

And then he staked his wife.

Draupadi. Queen of the Pandavas. Wife of all five brothers. The most powerful woman in the story.

He lost her too.

What happened next is the scene the Mahabharata never lets you forget.

Draupadi was dragged into the court by her hair. In front of the entire assembly of kings and elders and warriors. In front of her husbands who sat in silence, bound by the outcome of the dice game, unable or unwilling to act.

And Draupadi asked one question.

She did not beg. She did not weep. She asked a question.

She turned to the assembly and said: if Yudhishthira lost himself first, did he still have the right to stake me? A man who has lost himself is no longer a free man. A man who is no longer free cannot wager what belongs to another. Was I ever legitimately lost?

The entire court fell silent.

Bhishma, the greatest elder in the assembly, the wisest man in the room, the man who had dedicated his life to dharma, could not answer. Nobody could answer. The question hung in the air like smoke.

And in that silence, while Dushasana continued pulling at her robes, Draupadi closed her eyes and called to Krishna. And her robes became endless. The more Dushasana pulled, the more fabric appeared. He pulled until he was exhausted and collapsed. And Draupadi stood in the center of the court, undefeated, surrounded by a mountain of cloth.

Saved by a god because the men in the room had failed her completely.

The night before the war

The Pandavas completed their exile. They returned and asked for their kingdom back.

Duryodhana refused. Not five villages, he said. Not enough land to fit the point of a needle.

Krishna went to Hastinapura as a messenger of peace. One last attempt. Duryodhana refused. He even tried to have Krishna arrested.

War was coming.

The night before the battle, Kunti went to Karna. She told him the truth: you are my firstborn son, you are the elder brother of the Pandavas, you are fighting on the wrong side.

Karna listened. And said: you come to me now, after a lifetime of silence, after letting me be mocked and rejected because of my birth, a birth you gave me and then abandoned. You come to me now and ask me to switch sides.

And then he said the thing that breaks the story open.

I know Duryodhana is wrong. I have always known. But he stood beside me when the entire world turned its back. He gave me dignity when dignity was the one thing I needed. I cannot abandon him now because it has become inconvenient for others that I am loyal to him.

He would fight. But he promised Kunti this: he would not kill any of her sons except Arjuna. When it was over she would still have five sons. Either Arjuna would kill him or he would kill Arjuna. Either way, five sons.

Kunti wept. And walked away.

The war

The morning of battle, Arjuna stood in his chariot and looked across the field. He saw his grandfather in the opposing army. His teacher. His cousins. Everyone he had grown up with standing on the other side of a field that was about to become a graveyard.

He dropped his bow.

He sat down in his chariot and said: I cannot do this. These are my people. Whatever they have done, whatever wrong they have committed, they are my blood. The kingdom is not worth this. Nothing is worth this.

Krishna looked at Arjuna and did not comfort him. He said: from where has this weakness come upon you at this critical moment? It is unworthy of you. Cast off this faint-heartedness and stand up.

Hard words. Not the words of a friend consoling a grieving man. The words of someone who refused to let Arjuna hide behind feeling when clarity was what the moment demanded.

And then Krishna went deeper. You are not killing your grandfather. You cannot kill what is eternal. The body dies. The self does not. Your duty is clear. You are a warrior. This is a just war. The alternative is to let injustice stand because confronting it is painful.

Is that dharma? Or is that cowardice wearing the mask of compassion?

That is the Bhagavad Gita in one breath. Not a call to violence. A call to clarity.

Arjuna picked up his bow.

The war lasted eighteen days. Eighteen days that destroyed the world.

Karna fought Arjuna on the sixteenth day. The two greatest warriors alive. The wheel of Karna's chariot sank into the earth. He climbed down to free it and called to Arjuna to wait, to observe the rules of honorable combat that forbade attacking a man who was unarmed.

Krishna reminded Arjuna of Draupadi being dragged by her hair. Of Arjuna's teenage son Abhimanyu, surrounded and killed by multiple warriors who had abandoned those same rules of honorable combat. Of every promise of honor the other side had broken.

Arjuna released the arrow.

Karna died beside the wheel of his chariot. The greatest warrior of his age, the most loyal man in the story, died because of the circumstances of his birth, the enemies his loyalty had made him, and the curses placed on him by people who felt he had transgressed rules he was never told applied to him.

Nobody in the Mahabharata dies cleanly.

The ending the story earns

The Pandavas won. Of the millions who fought, only a handful survived.

As Duryodhana lay dying after the final mace battle, he said something. He said: I ruled a kingdom. I had loyal friends. I had the love of my family. I fought for what I believed was mine. I fell in battle like a warrior. What exactly did I lose?

Nobody had an answer for that either.

Yudhishthira sat on the throne of Hastinapura. And felt nothing. He ruled for years, just and wise and hollow.

Eventually he did what the Mahabharata says every man must do when the time comes. He walked away. He gave the kingdom to the next generation, gathered his brothers and Draupadi, and walked north toward the Himalayas.

One by one his companions fell on that final journey, each falling for a flaw they had carried their entire lives. Until only Yudhishthira walked alone. And a dog.

A dog had followed him the entire journey. Through the war, through the years of ruling, through the final walk.

At the gate of heaven, the gods came to take Yudhishthira. He said: the dog comes with me. They said: no animals in heaven. He said: then I do not go.

The man who had gambled away his wife, the man who told the one lie that killed his teacher, the man who had won a war at the cost of everything he loved, stood at the gate of heaven and refused to enter without a dog.

The dog revealed itself as Dharma. The god of righteousness. His father. Testing him one last time. Yudhishthira passed.

But the Mahabharata does not end there.

It ends with Yudhishthira in heaven, looking around, and finding the Kauravas there. Duryodhana seated in glory. The enemies he had spent his life fighting, the men whose crimes had cost everything, welcomed in the same place he had struggled his entire life to reach.

And finding his brothers in hell.

He refused to leave them. And in that refusal, the illusion ended. The vision dissolved. His brothers were revealed to be safe. The test was over.

But for a moment, for one long terrible moment, the man who had sacrificed everything for dharma stood in heaven and found his enemies there ahead of him.

What the Mahabharata is really asking

The Mahabharata does not tell you what dharma is. It shows you what happens to a civilization that could not agree on the answer.

It shows you a man who was right about everything, won everything, and lost everything.

It shows you a villain who had a point.

It shows you a hero who fought on the wrong side out of loyalty and died for it.

It shows you a woman who asked the right question and got no answer.

It shows you a god who drove a chariot and watched men die for principles he could have prevented them from fighting over.

And it leaves you with the only question that matters.

Not the battles. Not the weapons. Not the divine visions.

At the dice game. When Draupadi asked her question and the court fell silent. When everyone in that room knew what was right and did nothing.

What would you have done?

Vyasa wrote this thousands of years ago and began the epic with a line that has never stopped being true: whatever is here is found elsewhere. Whatever is not here is nowhere.

Everything that has ever happened between human beings is somewhere in this story. Every question about duty and loyalty and justice and love and what it costs to be right in a world that punishes you for it.

It is all here. It has always been here.

If this story resonated, I made a full video walking through the entire Mahabharata: The Mahabharata