Showing posts with label hindus. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hindus. Show all posts

Thursday, June 18, 2026

How did Hindus survive various invaders in the past 1000 years?

The story of 12 000 years of Vedic civilization and Dharmic Bharat is full of struggle and fight backs and the fight back against Islamic barbarism is the most long and costly for the Vedic Dharmic people.

Hinduism survived on the victories won by its followers and blood spilled to protect mother and mother land.

Did Islamic invaders rule the whole of Bharat as projected in our history books? Did the Islamic rule cover the whole of India? Were we always defeated? Did the rulers always surrender without a fight? NO. Did our ancestors offer stiff resistance and win battles? YES, Real history tells us a different story. And history, which we are being taught, hides the glories of our ancestors.

Samrat Lalitaditya Muktapida was the ruler of Kashmir when Junaid, the Arab governor of Sindh, attacked Kashmir following the orders of Caliph Hisham in the 8th century. The Kashmir king defeated Junaid and thus the Arab attempt of plundering Kashmir failed. Lalitaditya Muktapida also subjugated the Turks by attacking their territories. Raja Samgramaraja of Kashmir in the 11th century repulsed several attacks of Mahmud of Ghazni. Plunderer Mahmud could never defeat the Kashmiri king! Besides, Raja Samgramaraja also helped Trilochanpala, the Hindu Sahi ruler of Kabul, with an army against Mahmud of Ghazni. The combined army defeated Sultan Mahmud.

One of the biggest alliances of Indian rulers was witnessed when the Arabs attacked and ransacked cities up to Ujjain before the mid 8th century. The battle was fought between the Arab forces led by Emir Junaid and and an alliance of Indian dynasties led by Gurjar Pratihar king Nagbhat I. The Indian alliance comprised of Gurjar Pratihars, Chalukyas, Rashtrakuta, Guhil, etc. A series of battles was fought between Arabs and Hindus.

The final battle was fought in 738 AD in the borders of Rajasthan with Hindu forces led by Bappa Rawal outnumbered 1:10. The Arabs faced a crushing defeat. After this Muslim plunderers did not think of attacking India for several years, in fact, for more than a century.

Samrat Prithviraj Chauhan fought Mohammed Ghori and repealed and destroyed his multiple attacks before the tragic 1192 battle of Tarain. His 25 years were spent in humbling multiple islamic attacks.

Assam king Prithu defeated Bakhtiyar Khilji (the plunderer who burnt Nalanda University) in 1206 AD. Prithu badly wounded Khilji and made him bedridden. Ahoms stationed a strong force to counter attacks. The Ahoms defeated the Islamic invaders several times. In 1527 A.D., Rukunuddin Rukun Khan, the general of Nasiruddin Nasrat Shah, the Sultan of Bengal invaded Kamrupa only to be defeated by the Ahoms. Viswa Singha was then the Ahom king of Kamrupa. Hearing about the defeat of Rukun Khan, the Sultan dispatched his general Mit Manik with an army of one thousand horsemen and ten thousand foot soldiers. In this battle, the Ahoms won. Mit Manik was taken prisoner while Rukun Khan fled from the battlefield.

The Ahoms captured a large booty including some fire arms. And who isn’t familiar with Ahom general Lachit Borphukan who defeated the Mughals in the Battle of Saraighat in 1671.

Who doesn’t know about Taimur Lang, one of the most barbaric of Islamic invaders who massacred lakhs of Hindus, razed temples to the ground, and looted wealth of temples and civilians! All of this happened on his way from across the Indus River covering Attock towards Delhi. Do you know Taimur could not succeed in plundering India during his return expedition? Around 80,000 men from different communities, ranging from Jats, Gurjars, Rajputs, Brahmins to Ahirs, Valmikis, and hill tribes were part of the troop that attacked Taimur and slaughtered a major portion of his army. Meerut, Haridwar and neighboring areas were saved from being looted and plundered by Taimur. It was Devpala, a Jat who held a Mahapanchayat and made this possible.

Mahabali Jograj Singh Gurjar was the Supreme General while 20-year old Rampyari Gurjar was the General of 40,000 women warriors.

Together, the men and women warriors wreaked havoc on Taimur in Meerut and Haridwar in 1398, forcing him to flee India.

Mughal army sent by Shah Jahan in 1640 to attack Garhwal failed in the expedition. Rani Karnavati badly defeated them. She also cut the noses of the surviving Mughal soldiers due to which she was called Naak Kati Rani. Her cruel and merciless stance frightened the Mughals and they could never win Garhwal.

Likewise, Rani Bhavashankari, Akbar’s contemporary, made it compulsory to recruit a soldier from every family. She was the ruler of Bhurishhrestha of Bengal. She stationed forces at the border and well maintained her army. She defeated the Pathan Sultan thrice. Even Akbar did not interfere in her sovereignty.

Narasimhadeva from Orissa built the Konark temple after his victory against Islamic rulers. He attacked the Bengal Sultanate’s territories before the Sultan could attack him. During battle, he played one tactic played by the Islamic invaders and he won. It was 1248 AD.

Kapaya Nayaka, a Musunri Nayaka, in the South drove the Tughlaqs out of the Warrangal (then Telangana) territory in 1336 and re-established Hindu supremacy. He could do this with the help of 75 subordinate Nayakas; another best example of unity against a common foreign enemy. He also helped other South Indian kingdoms regain back their kingdoms from the Islamic invaders.

Raja Ganesha, a direct descendant of the Deva dynasty of Bengal, recaptured the throne of Bengal from Islamic rulers in 1414. He establish his superiority and Hindu dominion in a region dominated by the Muslims for over 200 years. According to the book Riyaz-us-Salatin, a chronicle written in Persian language by Ghulam Husain Salim Zaidpuri on the complete history of the Muslim rule in Bengal, nobleman Ganesha killed Shihabuddin and seized the throne. In alliance with another Hindu king Sivasimha of Mithila, Ganesha defeated Ibrahim Shah, a neighboring Sultan.

Prataprao Gurjar, the Swarajya Senapati and Morapant Pingle, the first Peshwa led the Hindavi Swarajya Maratha army of 20,000 soldiers against Mughals numbering 40,000 at Battle of Salher, Nashik 1672. Though the Marathas were less superior to the Mughals in terms of weaponry and war animals yet in this fierce battle, the Marathas emerged victorious.

Baba Banda Singh Bahadur, General of Guru Gobind Singh’s Khalsa army at the age of 38, led five battles to victory against Mughal and other Islamic forces. This included three battles in 1709 in Sonepat, Samana, and Sadhaura and two battles in 1710 at Chappar Chiri and Rahon. Following victory in Chappar Chiri battle, Banda Singh established his rule in Punjab. By 1710 Banda Singh Bahadur captured almost entire Punjab in the east of Lahore and put an end to Islamic rule in this region.

Rani Chennamma of Keladi fought against Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb’s forces. The battle took place because Chennamma gave shelter to Rajaram Raje Bhonsle, younger son of Chhatrapati Shivaji and facilitated his escape to Jinji Fort. It was the enemy Mughal forces who withdrew in this battle, sensing defeat and begged for a treaty. It was for the first time that the Mughals proposed peace accord with an Indian ruler! She also defeated the Sultan of Bijapur.

Let me mention 3 important battles since the list of battles and sacrifices by every Vedic hindu and every part of the country is so long that ages will pass if we recount all of them.

Battle of Baharich 1033

The battle of Bahraich was fought between the Turkic invader Salar Masud Ghazni and a confederation of several Indian kings led by Raja Sukhdev in the 11th century.

The nephew of Mahmood Ghazni, known as Salar Masud Ghazni, invaded India with an army of more than 100,000 men in may 1031 AD. This time, the army was not a raiding party like that of Mahmud Ghazni who came with intention of raiding, looting and retreating with the loot to Afghanistan . They were backed by the imperial army and came here with the intention of permanent conquest in India.

King Anandpal Shahi tried to check this Gazni advance towards heartland of India . He was helped by King of Sialkot , Rai Arjun. But, this alliance was overwhelmed by superiority of numbers of Turkic army. After defeating Anandpal Shahi and Rai Arjun, Masud advanced towards Malwa and Gujarat . King Mahipal Tomara tried to check their advance here but was defeated too.
After victories across North Indian plains, Masud Ghazni settled at Bahraich near Lucknow . He stayed here up to mid 1033. Meanwhile, 17 Kings of North India forged an alliance. This is the biggest confederation that have ever existed in India .

They were Rai Raib, Rai Saib, Rai Arjun, Rai Bheekhan, Rai Kanak, Rai Kalyan, Rai Makaru, Rai Savaru, Rai Aran, Rai Birbal, Rai Jaypal, Rai Shreepal, Rai Harpal, Rai Hakru, Rai Prabhu, Rai Deo Narayan and Rai Narsinha. Raja Bhoj of Malwa also played an important role in this battle. The head of this confederation was Raja Suheldev.

On June 12th 1033, as per Hindu traditions, Masud Ghazni was intimated by Vedic confederation that the land belonged to Hindus and Masud should evacuate these lands. Masud replied that all land belongs to Khuda and hence he would not retreat.

On 13th June, Morning, vedic army of about 120,000 descended on Ghazni camp of Bahraich. Masud's army was completely besieged and encircled. The battle continued for hours. In the end, each and every man in Masood's camp was killed. No POW's were taken, no mercy was shown on the Turkic army. The location of this battle to be precise was near Chittaura Jheel, a lake about 8 KM away from modern Bahraich on Bahraich-Gond Road . The battle ended on 14th June with Victory of Raja Suheldev and his Hindu alliance.On the evening of 14 June 1033 AD,Sunday Salar Masud was beheaded by Raja Suheldev. The battle ended with Victory of Hindu alliance.

The invasion was completely crushed and such resounding was this victory that none of the king from Northwest dared to invade India for 160 years.

Battle of Haldighati 1576

Maharana Pratap - 22000 men consisting of Hindu Rajputs,Hindu Bhils and Indo Afghan contingent of 800 men led by Hakim Sur

Strength - 22 000 men and Maharana Pratap

Jalauddin's forces and led by collaborator Man singh - 88000 men consisting of 30 000 Rajputs, and rest Turk,Mongol, Irani and other islamist mercenaries, reserve of nearly 30 000 more islamists, artillery, while Maharana only had archers

Strength - nearly 140 000 men, and another 30 000 marching from Delhi

Result - 14 000 sacrificed themselves from Maharana's forces including his sister's husband Yuvraj Shalivahan Tanwar/Tomar of Gwalior

Jalaludin's forces lost more than 60 000 men and were pushed back nearly 10 kms backwards by the charge of Rajput forces, many thousands incapacitated, not a single inch of territory gained.

Jalaludin’s plans for Hindu domination met a sad demise since the effect of the battle lifted the morale across country and also put to shame the Hindu collaborators of Islamic state. Maharana Pratap continued the struggle and ended the domination of Rajasthan and Central Bharat.

Battle For Hindavi Swarajya 1680 to 1707

Chatrapati Shivaji Raje Maharaj laid the foundation of Hindavi Swarajya, the self rule and creation of a Pan Bharat Hindu empire.

Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj defeated and ended the decades of Islamic tyranny, he destroyed the sultanates and came in direct conflict with the terrorist Aurangzeb. But the biggest Battle came when Maharaj left this world.

After Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj left this world, Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj became the head of Hindavi Swarajya. He was facing the challenge of very extinction of Vedic civilization as we know it from Aurangzeb.

Aurangzeb had enormous army numbering 5 lakh soldiers, a number more than 8 times that of the Hindu army.

He had plentiful support of artillery, horses, elephants. He also brought huge wealth in royal treasuries. Teaming up with Portuguese, British ,Siddis, Golkonda and Bijapur Sultanates he planned to encapsulate Swarajya from all sides and to form a deadly death trap.

However it took 7 years for the Islamic tyrant to win first fort and that also at tremendous loss, Sambhaji Maharaj though with great peril and great sacrifice as well as lack of unity in the Swarajya kept the invader at bay. Treachery struck and Sambhaji Maharaj and his aide Kavi Kalash were captured by Aurangzeb.

The Lion was killed by Hyenas in 1689 after Maharaj refused to leave his rule and his vedic religion. Aurangzeb thought that with Sambhaji martyred, he will crush Marathas, return his focus to ending Rajputs, Sikhs and Ahoms as well as Jats, Gurjars and establish a Dar ul Islam ending the Sanatan civilization.

But when news spread of Sambhaji’s sacrifice, behold, all the Maratha generals and common people united under the flag of Swarajya with Rajaram declared Chatrapati and gave such a fight from 1689 onwards that the islamic invaders felt as if Sambhaji is still leading the charge.

Sambhaji in death was still as dangerous to the barbarians as he was in his life. People from around the country who were persecuted by the Islamic tyrants joined the Maratha fold,farmer, barber, cobbler, banker all rose and fought making victories costlier for Aurangzeb.

Aurangzeb was never able to leave Deccan and south and the war that he wanted to finish in 27 days dragged on for 27 years from 1680 to 1707. The Vedic Culture victories kept on increasing after 1689 inspired by the heroic sacrifice of Sambhaji. 20 lakh Islamist soldiers were killed, 5 lakh vedic Maharathis laid down their lives.

Aurangzeb died sad death on 3rd March 1707 as the Bhagwa ancient flag rose higher and higher. His empire of Islam crumbled and dreams of a Dar ul Islam died a painful death, with Sambhaji having his revenge. Aurangzeb killed Sambhaji by deceit but even in his death, Sambhaji ended the tyrant foreign islamic rule and brought in a new dawn of liberation for the 10 000 year old country and vedic civilization.

Soon after, Shrimant Peshwa Bajirao under Chatrapati Sahuji defeated every Islamic tyrant with his 42 victories nearly building back the rule of Vedic Indian Civilization on Majority of Bharat.

Our ancestors made sacrifices that will wet your eyes but kept the Bhagwa on the land called Bharat, we lost territory only in 20th century to the treachery of congress.

Anywhere you stand from Kabul to Rangoon, Kashmir to Colombo, and this current divided country we live in, pick a handful of soil and touch it your forehead, for there is not a inch of land that did not see sacrifice and not a single Vedic Indian who did not sacrifice.

Har Har Har Mahadev

Satrane Uddane hunkar vadani II
Kari dalmal bhoomandal sindhujawal gagani
Gadbadile brhamand dhake tribhuvani II
Survar nar nishachar tya jhalya palani

Jai Jai Jai Shri Ram.

Saturday, April 18, 2026

Are there any Indian Christians who converted into Hinduism? If yes, why?

 

  1. Diana Mariam Kurian - stage name - Nayanthara

2. Dr. K J YESUDAS - follows Hinduism but does not give up Christianity

It was Yesudas’s father who the first to sing a devotional song for Lord Ayyappa in any film song,

it is Yesudas’s version of the Harivarasanam which is played at Sabarimala.

3. Padma Bhushan E. C. George Sudarshan , a physicist and a professor at the University of Texas. Sudarshan has been credited with numerous contributions to the field of theoretical Physics including optical coherenceSudarshan-Glauber representationV-A theoryTachyonsQuantum Zeno effectopen quantum system and Lindblad equationspin–statistics theorem, non-invariance groups, positive maps of density matrices, quantum computation among others (source wikipedia)

E. C. George Sudarshan - Wikipedia

Others who willfully accepted their husband’s religion after marriage :

4. actress Lissy Priyadarshan →

5. actress Jomol →

6. actress Annie Shaji Kailas →

Thanks!

Friday, November 14, 2025

What is the root cause of hatred between Hindus and Muslims in India?

 The Hindu Muslim conflict is not created and one must note that conflicts with Muslims existed and exist not only in India but worldwide.

So in the West it is Christians vs Muslims, in the Middle East it is Jews vs Muslims, in India it is Hindus vs Muslims, in Afghanistan it is Sikhs vs Muslims, in Myanmar it is Buddhists vs Muslims and again in Oceania it is Christians vs Muslims.

Why are everyone against Muslims? Because Islam is basically an imperial religion which propagates that there is no other true God except Allah and believes that people of other religions are kafirs or infidels who should be converted to Islam by any way possible. Because of this smugness most Muslims find it difficult to adjust in any country they go to. For eg: India though has been invaded many times in history has seen all invaders who settled down here adjust in the home culture of India be it the Greeks or the Huns but Muslims never really adjusted to the culture in India (or anywhere in the world).

Let us take a note of great civilizations which were put to dust due to Islamic invasions and insistence on monotheism:

a) Egyptian civilization b) Parsi civilization in Persia (Iran) c) Indus Valley Civilization in the territory now called Pakistan d) Mesopotamian civilization e) Native African tribal civilizations f) the polytheistic religions of ancient Mecca g) the Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs of Afghanistan

And how has Islam spread so fast world wide? Not by making people realize that it is a better religion but mainly through jihad, warfare, conquests, manipulations, etc. The country Spain had become Islamic in medevial history however Christian Patriots teamed up and dethroned Islamic ruler Boabdil and reconverted the masses forcibly converted Islam back to Christianity however such examples are less as most countries whose native civilizations collapsed could not stand up to the Islamic onslaught they faced.

There is no hate or false propaganda here when it comes to India. Hindutva in simple words means core-Indianness. You can only be a core Indian if you regard the Indian soil as your own home. The original communities of Hindus, Buddhists, Sikhs, Jains and Lingayats originated right here hence no controversy on that and all are considered to be in the core-Indian fold.

Parsi or Jew communities didn't originate here but are also agreeable in the Hindutva definition because they accepted this soil as their own as they faced persecutions on other lands before they settled in India. Muslims and Christians who can put their country above their religion and in general live an Indian way of life are also core-Indians and complementary to the Hindutva concept.

Speaking of Hindu word in Hindutva (the word Hindu is used for core-Indianness here as ours is basically an Indus (Hind) civilization where all indigenous communities follow a similar Hindu way of life which is peculiar to this land).

However hardliner Muslims and Christians who put their religion above their country are regarded as pariahs (outsiders) because:

a) Islamic and Christian communities didn't originate on this soil. Their places of worship and their kind of people live elsewhere in the world creating conflict of interest For eg- if India tomorrow goes to war against Saudi Arabia, the home of Mecca and Medina then whom will the Muslims support or whom will Christians support if we are at loggerheads with the Vatican?

b) The Quran teaches Muslims to be monotheistic (worship only one God), adhere to Muhammed, worship no idols, and propagate their religion to maximum people. Their religion differs from core religions of India as we are polytheistic and worship many Gods, our prophets or Gods reborn in human forms as per our mythology did fight wars with a message that good will triumph over evil and not with a message that its a victory of my religion over yours. Hardliner Christians like Muslims also believe that non-Christians are not civilized unless they convert to Christianity

c) Most Indian cultures believe in showing gratitude to even animals and equipment which help us in our day to day lives so cows are held in high regard, bullocks have a festival dedicated to them and even machines and instruments are worshipped on certain occasions. Hence culturally Hindutva finds beef eating abominable which Muslims in some parts of the world do.

d) the belief that Muslims have violence in their blood as even their children witness animal sacrifices from a very young age and it becomes a part of life to witness sacrifices every year. Hindu butchers or sacrifice practitioners on the contrary take care to keep children out when a sacrifice is being performed and most sacrifices in Hindu culture are performed with a jhatka concept (where death is administered quickly and with a view to cause least pain unlike the Halal concept followed by Muslims where the death is slowed down)

e) Hardcore Muslims wear unique dress, and display a lifestyle which resembles a Middle East culture more than an Indian one. Non hardliner Muslims often follow the Hindu or cosmopolitan way of life and can blend well into Indian Society.

f) Hard-core Muslims grow on a religion centric concept in which loyalty to their religion is greater than loyalty to a country or specific land. Again different from Hindutva where loyalty to our land and soil is highly regarded.

g) India was also ruled at various times in history by Muslim rulers who fanatically tried to propagate their religion but also whose community members are today regarded as minorities to be protected and appeased for votes.

h) Hardliner Hindutva stops where and when hardliner Islam stops too. Veer Savarkar famously said that he will forget his religion when the Moslem is ready to forgets his.

So basically Hindutva is not about Muslim bashing, it's more about bashing hardliners and fanatics who try to spread and propagate their culture in our lands.

This answer is not meant to offend someone but to highlight the concept in a more direct manner without using euphemisms.