Tuesday, June 30, 2026

Who was the choosen one in Mahabharat?

 If we go by the epic, there is no single, definitive "chosen one." Rather, there are multiple chosen ones depending on the definition and criteria being used. In my opinion, the main chosen ones are Karna, Lord Krishna, Arjuna and partly Duryodhana (he's more like a supporting character).

For example, if the criterion is whose destiny was to create dissension within the Kuru lineage and ultimately lead to the Great War, then I would argue it is Karna. I don't think Duryodhana fits this criterion, for the simple reason that it was only after Karna entered the picture to challenge Arjuna and the Pandavas that Duryodhana started actively pursuing schemes to destroy the Pandavas and remove them from the equation. Before that, he generally tolerated Bhima in public and only attempted to kill him secretly by poisoning and drowning him. He never sought a great war, nor did he even seem to think about one. Instead, he relied on petty methods such as sending the Pandavas away, attempting to kill them secretly in the Laksha Griha while making it look like an accident, or defeating them indirectly through gambling and exile. Duryodhana never intended to openly wage a great war to destroy the Pandavas.

It was Karna who repeatedly instigated war and deeper dissension. After Draupadi's svayamvara, he advised Duryodhana to immediately attack the Panchalas and the Pandavas before they could gather allies. During the Virata war, he urged the Kauravas to kill Arjuna quickly so that the remaining Pandavas would commit suicide. Throughout the epic, it is almost always Karna who instigates greater dissension between the Kauravas and the Pandavas and pushes for war. This role is repeatedly highlighted by Narada, Bhishma, Drona, and Vidura.

By the same reasoning, I don't think even Lord Krishna fits this specific criterion of creating war and dissension within the Kuru dynasty. His purpose is slightly different. His mission is to destroy evil, reduce adharma, and lighten the burden of the Earth by eliminating wicked rulers. He did not require the Kurukshetra War to accomplish that. He had already slain many evil kings and beings such as Kamsa, Narakasura, Shishupala, Putana, Bakasura, Shalva, Banasura, and many others. Jarasandha, too, was eliminated before the Kurukshetra War through Krishna's own plan. In Ghatotkacha vadha Parva, after the death of Ghatotkacha, Lord Krishna himself tells Arjuna that, if necessary, these evil rulers would have perished regardless.

Krishna also made repeated attempts to prevent the war. He negotiated for half the kingdom, then for five villages. He personally travelled to Hastinapura as a peace envoy, revealed his Vishvarupa before Duryodhana and Karna, and even suggested arresting—or, if absolutely necessary, killing—Duryodhana for the welfare of the kingdom. Every attempt at peace failed. So, Krishna is the chosen one in the sense that he was destined to destroy evil and reduce the burden of the Earth.


In the same way, Arjuna is the chosen one in the sense that he serves as Krishna's divine instrument for eliminating that evil. He destroys or helps destroy many of the principal obstacles, including the Nivatakavachas, Kalakeyas, Bhishma (through Shikhandi), Karna, and numerous Naga warriors. Throughout the epic, Arjuna is repeatedly protected and empowered by divine intervention. Krishna protects him from Karna's Vasavi Shakti, the serpent-headed weapon, the Brahmastra, Drona's celestial weapons, Ashwatthama's Agneyastra, and, through divine grace and Lord Shiva's boon, the Narayanastra.

This is also why, after Krishna stepped down from Arjuna's chariot at the end of the war, the chariot immediately burst into flames. Later, after Krishna departed from the Earth, Arjuna could no longer effectively wield the Gandiva or even remember many of his celestial weapons. As a result, he was defeated by the Abhira robbers and failed to protect Krishna's wives.

Along with this, Arjuna was also aided by various divine beings on different occasions. During his battle against the Saindhava forces, when he was nearly killed and rendered unconscious, the Brahmarshis revived him and restored his energy. Hanuman sat upon his chariot, weakening Arjuna's enemies through his mighty roars while protecting both Arjuna and his chariot from numerous celestial weapons. Lord Shiva likewise aided him during the fourteenth and fifteenth days of the Kurukshetra War. Arjuna was repeatedly destined, protected, and empowered to accomplish the tasks ordained for him by the gods. Thus, Arjuna can indeed be regarded as the chosen one in the sense that he serves as the divine instrument through whom much of that destiny was fulfilled.

Just like Arjuna serves as Lord Krishna's divine instrument, I would consider Duryodhana to be an aid or a means through which Karna's destiny of bringing about a great war is realised. That is why it was only after Karna entered the picture that Duryodhana began openly opposing the Pandavas and actively turned against them. It was Karna who constantly fuelled their enmity, whether during the Ghosha Yatra Parva or the Virata Parva. It was only with Karna's support and encouragement that Duryodhana became willing to openly confront the Pandavas in battle.

By himself, Duryodhana often appears too insecure and politically cautious to directly wage war against the Pandavas. Instead, he preferred indirect methods such as poisoning Bhima, the Laksha Griha plot, and the game of dice. A good example is the Ghosha Yatra episode, where, after being humiliated and rescued by the very Pandavas he hated, Duryodhana was prepared to give up his life out of shame. It was Karna who, through his persuasive words, restored Duryodhana's resolve. Even after that, it was only when the demons assured him of their support and reminded him of his purpose that he regained the will to live and continue his struggle.

So, in that sense, Duryodhana can be seen more as an instrument through whom Karna—and, by extension, the demons' objective of bringing about the great conflict—fulfilled their purpose, much like Arjuna serves as Lord Krishna's and the devas' instrument in accomplishing theirs.


There are also what could be called "mini chosen ones"—characters whose destinies are tied to accomplishing a specific purpose rather than the overarching narrative. For example, Draupadi is often described as one of the reasons behind the Great War, although I would argue that she was only one contributing factor and that the struggle for the Kuru kingdom was the primary cause. Similarly, Dhrishtadyumna was born specifically to bring about Drona's death, while Shikhandi's destiny was inseparably linked to Bhishma's fall. In the same way, many other characters in the epic were "chosen" for particular roles or destinies. Thus, rather than having one exclusive chosen one, the Mahabharata presents multiple chosen figures, each fulfilling a different divine purpose depending on the context and the criterion being considered.

Is there any train way to go from India to Sri Lanka?

 As of now there is no train service between India and Sri Lanka countries, because these countries don't have land connectivity to reach.

Now either option is by travel by train till nearest railway station:-

  1. Chennai Central/ Chennai Egmore
  2. Nagapattinam Junction

From Chennai, direct flight available to Sri Lanka (by air option)

2nd option is alight at Nagapattinam Junction Railway Station

Then take a ferry Nagapattinam-Kankensanthurai Ferry

From Kankensanthurai to Colombo Sri Lanka’s Capital City distance is 418 km, by train or bus you can reach there

Ferry fare will be around Rs 4000 per head.

From Delhi/Mumbai Direct flights available if you are not looking for ferry journey

In past There used to be a train from Madras to Dhanushkodi which is connected with a ferry to Talaimannar in Sri Lanka,

due to cyclones in 1964 near Rameswaram Dhanushkodi it vanished away and ferry service discontinued.

From thalaimannar to Colombo distance is 337 km.

Is ghee healthier than butter?

 Ghee and butter come from the same place but are two different things and the differences are much bigger than one might imagine. Ghee is butter without any water left in it and with all the milk solids removed. Simple sounding as it may be, this clarification significantly changes the properties of the product in question.

Namely, there are no milk solids left so ghee is completely lactose and casein free. This makes ghee suitable for many people who are sensitive to dairy products and would otherwise have to put up with feeling sick after having their morning toast. So in terms of tolerability ghee wins hands down.

Ghee is also superior when it comes to cooking since it has a smoke point of 250°C whereas butter's smoke point is 150°C. What this means is that you will not burn the fat when you cook with it. Not only will your dishes taste less bitter but also you won't be introducing harmful oxides into your body. So overall, for frying, roasting and other methods ghee is clearly preferable.

Ghee and butter do not really differ nutritionally except for the fact that there are more fat soluble vitamins (such as A, E and K) as well as butyrate (which is said to promote gut health and decrease inflammation) in ghee than in butter. So in terms of nutrients ghee wins a little bit.

Is ghee better for you? Overall, yes. Most of the time it is healthier than butter for most people. However, there is an approach to everyday food choice that I came across and that changed my perception of my diet completely.

Why do Sarasvati, Lakshmi, and Gauri worship Goddess Kamakshi in Kanchipuram?

 Have you ever thought about why even the mightiest goddesses are depicted worshipping some other Goddess? It is very intriguing at first sight—that is why the legend of Goddess Kamakshi at Kanchipuram is so intriguing!

Maa Saraswati, Lakshmi, or Gauri (Parvati)

In the tradition of Hinduism, Kamakshi does not appear as a different manifestation from those of Saraswati, Lakshmi, or Gauri (Parvati). She is rather worshipped as the ultimate form of Adi Shakti, the divine power from which all these forms arise.

It is believed that Saraswati stands for knowledge, Lakshmi for wealth, and Gauri for strength and compassion. They all symbolize one energy in its various forms. And Kamakshi is the complete one.

As per another myth, Maa Saraswati, Lakshmi, and Gauri did penance at Kanchipuram for paying respect to and obtaining blessings from Kamakshi. This means that only if knowledge, wealth, and power are in tune with divine consciousness do they acquire their full significance.

This is one concept that holds deep significance for me. In the practical world, success, wisdom, or even power are pursued individually by people. But this story helps us see that all this can lead to happiness only through wisdom, humility, and goodness.

This is precisely why Kanchipuram occupies an eminent position in Hinduism. The reason behind this is because Kanchipuram symbolizes the union of all powers of Shakti as one.

Irrespective of whether one views this tale in terms of history, symbolization, or devotion, the lesson will always be universal and unchanging: All the strengths we have derive from a single divine source. Recognizing that singularity is supreme devotion.

Who is the best Bollywood Dancers among Karishma Kapoor, Kareena Kapoor, Deepika Padukone, Aishwariya Rai Bacchan and Madhuri Dixit?

 Madhuri Dixit is the one among these actress who is trained in multiple classical dance forms well before she came to films. Also she has handled complex choreographies and has given some of the most popular dance number of Hindi cinema from Ek do Teen, Hamko Aajkal hai, Choli ke peeche, Dhak dhak karne lagaa, and dola re dola etc. I would rate her higher as a dancer than as an actor.

Aishwarya Rai Bachchan has performed great dance numbers in Ham Dil De Chuke Sanam and Devdas. Otherwise too she was a very graceful dancer with wonderful dance numbers to her credit including Kajrare and Crazy kiya Re or even Ishq Kameena.

Karishma Kapoor was one dancer who evolved wonderfully with time. Her biggest accomplishment was to look graceful dancing with a dancer like Sunny Deol in Yaara o Yaara and at the same time match steps with Govinda who was a fantastic dancer. Also, she literally overshadowed Madhuri and even matches her dancing intensity in Dil to Pagal Hai. In her heydeys she was a sight to behold.

Between Kareena and Deepika it is difficult to choose because there is lack of complex choreography for them though they have done considerable number of dance songs. Deepika was good in Pinga though couldn't match the intensity of Dola re dola.

Kareena haa done item songs like Mera naam mary and fevicol but I don't remember her doing complex dance numbers or even classical Indian dance. So I would give benifit of doubt to Deepika.

What are some amazing and lesser known stats or facts about Sachin Tendulkar?

 I bet you are not aware of most of the facts because they are not available anywhere online. I have extracted this information from his biography Playing it My way.

When Sachin Tendulkar was scolded for the innings that made him famous- Sachin Tendulkar and Vinod Kambli became overnight sensation for their record breaking partnership of 664 runs in the Harry Sheild Cup. Sachin Tendulkar scored 326* and Vinod Kamble scored 349* not out and played till the lunch of second day. But Sachin’s coach Ramakant Achrekar wanted them to declare their innings in the morning itself after both the players completed their double centuries. He sent his assistant to inform the same to the two players but they ignored the advice and continued batting. When they were going out during lunch the assistant told them that they are in big trouble. Sachin decided to declare the innings but Kambli asked him not to do it because he was playing at 349* and wanted to complete his 350. So Sachin telephones hos coach to ask him and Achrekar asked him - “How many wickets have you people taken”? Sachin told them we haven't declared yet. Then he said Kambli wants to ask something and handed him the phone. But Kambli was so scare of Achrekar that he didn't came on call and they decided to declare. After the end of match which they won, Achrekar called a meeting where they read out the list of indiscipline by both these batsman including Kambli flying kite in the middle of the match on the ground!!

Sachin Tendulkar had a habit of taking and giving challenges and not just about Cricket -

Since childhood Sachin was a prankster who used to play pranks on his neighbours like throwing water on strangers or plucking mangoes on Sunday afternoons. He was adamant to get a new bicycle as all his friends had one. His father got him one but he got into an accident just a few hours after getting his bicycle. So after a few days he got injured again while wicket-keeping and he didn't had money to take a taxi or go to hospital so he walked down home with blood coming out of his face. After these incidents he started riding bicycle slowly and almost stopped wicket-keeping in cricket.

During 1992 World Cup in Australia, Sachin Tendulkar with his othe teammates challenges Venkatapati Raju to pull the moustache of Merve Hughes (Raju was lean and thin and Merve Hughes was ill tempered and big in size). Everybody thought Raju will get a good thrashing but Raju managed to pull the moustache and escaped unarmed which mad him a hero.

During the India England series 2002 he took up a major eating challenge at West Yorkshire. One of his friend suggested visiting the famous Harry Ramsden’s, in Guiseley in West Yorkshire. This restaurant, served great fish and chips and Ajit Agarkar and Sachin decided to try out the fare. There was one item on the menu titled Harry’s Challenge, whichinvited the customer to eat a giant portion of fish, either cod or haddock, served with chips, bread and butter and two other side dishes. If successful, the head chef would personally sign a certificate for the customer. Since Sachin had always been a big eater, so he decided to take on the challenge. He managed the giant portion of fish fairly comfortably and also polished off the salad and other side dishes served. The only thing he did not eat was the chips, which he thought might be just a little too fattening. Impressed with his performance, the chef signed the Harry’s Challenge certificate.

Music Lover- Sachin Tendulkar was named after the great music director Sachin Dev Burman. The whole Tendulkar family was fond of music. And Sachin was particularly a big fan of Pankaj Udhas. At one point he sent his brother Nitin to Dubai to get the latest album of Pankaj Udhas and waited till midnight to get hold of the casette. Also interestingly when the Indian team went to play Pakistan in the semi-final of World Cup 2011, he asked his teammates if they have the song “Bade Acche Lagte hai” on their iPod. Then he uploaded the song on his iPod and listened to that one song for the next few days on loop to ease his nerves. He also considers O paalanhare as his favourite song at times of adversity.

Who is the richest actor among Shahrukh Khan, Salman Khan and Aamir Khan?

 Shahrukh Khan is the richest among three Khan's, followed by Salman Khan and Aamir Khan.

Net Worth of Shahrukh Khan -Rs 12,931 Cr.

Net Worth of Salman Khan -Rs 3,225 Cr.

Net Worth of Aamir Khan- Rs 1,860 Cr.

How can I go to Nepal? Is there any direct train facility?

 Yes, you can go to Nepal from India by Train, but you cannot go till Kathmandu because Kathmandu doesn't have Railway line

You have 2 option to reach Nepal by train

The rail option:- Travel by train to a border station in India such as

  1. Raxaul Junction
  2. Jaynagar
  3. Jogbani

All these Railway Station are in Bihar.

However more convenient option is taking a train to Raxaul Junction, which is 144 km away to Nepal’s Capital City. By Taxi or Bus you can reach there which will take 4 hours journey

2nd option is cross border train

From Jaynagar, cross border passenger train operating by Nepal Railway Jaynagar-Kurtha Demu Train

Then by road Kurtha to Kathmandu taxi or bus.

This is the only main regular international train operates from India to Nepal and vice versa, but distance is slightly more when compared to Raxaul Junction

From Jaynagar to Kathmandu Distance is 270 km

From Jogbani to Kathmandu Distance is 388 km

From South India only 3 train service available

  1. 16001/Erode Jogbani Amrit Bharat Express
  2. 17005/Hyderabad Deccan Nampally-Raxaul Jn Weekly Express
  3. 17433/Tirupati-Raxaul Jn Weekly Express

If you are planning for Nepal Trip you can take a train from Delhi (if you are coming from Northern Part, Jammu, Punjab, Himachal, Haryana, Rajasthan

From Maharashtra Several trains available to Raxaul like

Lokmanya Tilak Raxaul Antyodaya SF Express and Raxaul Karmabhumi Express

Or another option is you can come to Patna junction or Howrah Junction, from there frequent of trains available to Raxaul

What is the most ingenious "tourist trap" you have ever fallen into?

 During our holiday to celebrate our 20th birthday in Italy (in Amalfi, near Naples), we took a trip to Capri (which is a small island off the western end of a peninsula) by water taxi (like a bus, on the water - nothing to do with a boat cruise).

Upon arrival in Capri, there were monumental queues for boats offering tours of Capri – visiting various caves (including the Blue Grotto).

We had considered taking a boat tour around the island (my wife loves boats - she never misses an opportunity) and while we were considering our options, we were approached by a charming local (named Mario, I think) who offered to take us around the island on his private boat.

A tourist trap indeed. It might have been a scam...

But we were feeling adventurous, so we went for it.

And we were right because… it was magnificent!

A private boat took us to visit every little cave around the island. Privately, just for us. It was fantastic!

A selection of photos:

Mario - our adorable pilot and cameraman!

If you ever find yourself visiting Capri, I recommend avoiding the main commercial routes and talking to the friendly private boat owners.

A wonderful experience, and a truly triumphant moment (in the middle of a week of enchantment).

What are the most controversial statements made by Bollywood actors/actresses?

 Some of the most controversial statements made by Indian actors/Actresses

Much before “It's her choice” made headlines, Nehad Dhupia took the media by storm by her b*ld scenes in the film Julie (2004). When she was asked about those scenes in the film she made a very shocking statement.

she had made her career with some b*ld movie like Julie and Sheesha. In an interview she defended her choice of films saying that at this point only two things sell “s*x and SRK”. She said that because SRK is not part of Julie she had to make up for it through the other S.

There was a lot of controversy about this statement. The scenes and the statement has benefited the film which became a surprise hit even though Neha Dhupia moved on from that image after a few years and made a space in the offbeat films and supporting roles. She also refused to work in Julie 2 which became a massive failure (it earned less than the first past even after releasing more than a decade later).

Neha Dhupia never really apologised or clarified her statement though in 2023 her comment hot headlines again when Pathaan became a monumental success and many people heralded it as return of Bollywood. One man tweeted her quote and Neha Dhupia replied on that tweet saying that her statement holds true even after 20 years.

What would have happened if the Twin Towers had been hit but never fell?

 If the twin towers had been built a little more solidly , as the Empire State Building was, with steel beams connecting in a grid of ten-foot boxes, instead of a cage with concrete floors poured over corrugated metal, when the planes hit the towers they might have withstood the test of heat versus gravity.

The Empire State Building is solidly constructed. Within its stone and mortar skin lies a steel skeleton. It is likely to survive for the next 1,000 years, a monument unlike any other, a true wonder of the world.

Truth be told, it didn't matter. The attacker caused minimal damage, crashing into the 96th floor.

In the center, below the FBI agent and the tourists, you can see that the steel beam was bent, but was still holding.

The biggest problem with the twin towers, however, was their open format . Much of the building's support was on the outside. The steel mesh allowed the building to flex in the wind, yet still support the open floors. There were only eight main support columns on each side of the central shaft, 32 in total.

When the planes crashed into the buildings, they cut the

steel

mesh . Thus

, the integrity of both buildings was compromised.

If there had been an entire steel structure inside the building, it probably could have been repaired and still be in use today. However, when the

steel

mesh

and perhaps some of the 32 support columns were compromised , collapse became inevitable . When one floor fell , another was too heavy to bear the load, and it collapsed like a stack of pancakes.

It was a perfect accidental implosion, as the net was pulled inward as each floor collapsed. It likely saved more than a million lives by collapsing that way. Imagine if the walls had fallen outward, landing on thousands of buildings and the crowds of onlookers.

In the end, we learned a lot about the structural support and safety of an exposed city. One World Trade was built with a steel cage.